Analysis of Netflix’s ‘Mary’: What They Got Right and Wrong

ve and talk. To truly appreciate her, you need to see her as a tough, yet loving Jewish mother with a radiant presence, much like Mother Teresa. Noa Cohen portrays a youthful Mary admirably in the film, capturing her essence up until the flight into Egypt.

However, there are moments in the film where the portrayal of Mary’s human side may veer off course. For example, at the Annunciation, Mary’s words seem to suggest a status for herself rather than complete submission to God’s will, which misses the mark.

Despite these flaws, the movie does address important questions that Catholics may have about Mary. For instance, Mary is depicted as sinless, with hints of the Immaculate Conception in her character. The film also includes scenes such as Mary’s presentation in the Temple, which isn’t in the Gospels but is implied.

Furthermore, the movie delves into Mary’s vow of lifelong virginity and her willingness to endure the pain of childbirth, showcasing different interpretations and traditions regarding these events. While some portrayals in the film may be less appealing, such as the depiction of the angel Gabriel, there are commendable aspects, like the portrayal of Satan and King Herod by Anthony Hopkins.

The character of Joseph, while initially portrayed as a caring husband, takes a turn towards excessive violence in the film, straying from the Gospel narrative. The movie’s emphasis on aggression as a solution to problems may not align with the true nature of the human experience.

Despite its shortcomings, the film ends on a poignant note with Mary’s message of love’s sacrificial nature and its ultimate power to save the world, a fitting theme for the Advent season.

In conclusion, “Mary” on Netflix may have its flaws, but it offers a unique perspective on the life of Mary and prompts viewers to contemplate faith and cinema’s intersection in a thought-provoking manner.